<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government should learn from Steiner and home schoolers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/</link>
	<description>An open conversation about Steiner education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I only used reading as an example and I don&#039;t think reading levels are all that meaningful.

Both reading speed and comprehension are valuable.  The faster you read and the more you comprehend, the more books you can read and the more you will enjoy them.  

So I would say, you start on day one and work toward a reading goal in terms of words per minute.  (Very easy to measure).  I think a reasonable goal is around 1000 wpm.  It&#039;s likely to take years to get to that level but it&#039;s really about technique and a lot of practice.  Almost everything worth learning takes practice.  

I think a reasonable comprehension goal is around 90%.  Again it takes years and practice but I think there&#039;s a lot of value in getting something out of what you read.

The best approach is that it&#039;s not a single class in grade 1.  It&#039;s something that is built into other studies and stretches over multiple years.  

Competence builds confidences which leads to motivation.  I state one the first day that everyone can be a great reader and the benefits are huge.  It&#039;s going to take time and practice but we have 12 years to work on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only used reading as an example and I don&#8217;t think reading levels are all that meaningful.</p>
<p>Both reading speed and comprehension are valuable.  The faster you read and the more you comprehend, the more books you can read and the more you will enjoy them.  </p>
<p>So I would say, you start on day one and work toward a reading goal in terms of words per minute.  (Very easy to measure).  I think a reasonable goal is around 1000 wpm.  It&#8217;s likely to take years to get to that level but it&#8217;s really about technique and a lot of practice.  Almost everything worth learning takes practice.  </p>
<p>I think a reasonable comprehension goal is around 90%.  Again it takes years and practice but I think there&#8217;s a lot of value in getting something out of what you read.</p>
<p>The best approach is that it&#8217;s not a single class in grade 1.  It&#8217;s something that is built into other studies and stretches over multiple years.  </p>
<p>Competence builds confidences which leads to motivation.  I state one the first day that everyone can be a great reader and the benefits are huge.  It&#8217;s going to take time and practice but we have 12 years to work on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I would agree with you Steve up to a point, and thanks for your comment.  I guess where it&#039;s tricky is with, say, a 6 year old, who according to the mainstream should be reading at a particular level, whereas in the Steiner system would not yet have started to learn to read.  How can one assessment system allow for both systems of education?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with you Steve up to a point, and thanks for your comment.  I guess where it&#8217;s tricky is with, say, a 6 year old, who according to the mainstream should be reading at a particular level, whereas in the Steiner system would not yet have started to learn to read.  How can one assessment system allow for both systems of education?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Both testing and lack of testing have their upsides and downsides.  A better approach is to learn how to evaluate students without using paper and pencil tests as a crutch.  It&#039;s harder on teachers but easier on students.  

For example, here&#039;s a great reading test.  I give you a book and have you read a chapter to me.  I then ask you to tell me about what you read.  I now know a lot about your reading and comprehension level and what we need to work on going forward.  

Dealing with pressure and stress is a skill that can be learned.  It is a key to long term success.  It&#039;s something that schools should add to the curriculum other than just putting you under stress and hoping you figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both testing and lack of testing have their upsides and downsides.  A better approach is to learn how to evaluate students without using paper and pencil tests as a crutch.  It&#8217;s harder on teachers but easier on students.  </p>
<p>For example, here&#8217;s a great reading test.  I give you a book and have you read a chapter to me.  I then ask you to tell me about what you read.  I now know a lot about your reading and comprehension level and what we need to work on going forward.  </p>
<p>Dealing with pressure and stress is a skill that can be learned.  It is a key to long term success.  It&#8217;s something that schools should add to the curriculum other than just putting you under stress and hoping you figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/government-should-learn-from-steiner-and-home-schoolers/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steinerdialogue.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Please feel free to leave your comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please feel free to leave your comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
